Leveraged strategies compared

A side-by-side comparison of six leveraged ETF strategies, 3 Sig, 6 Sig, 9 Sig, TQQQ FTLT, Holy Grail and HFEA, by holdings, signals, results and risk.

Education only, not advice. Leveraged and strategy-driven investing can lose most of its value quickly. Figures are historical or backtested and do not predict future results.

Three families

Side by side

Strategy Main holding Leverage Signal Checks Reported max drawdown
3 Sig IJR or SPY + bonds 1x 3% quarterly signal line Quarterly About -52%
6 Sig MVV + bonds 2x 6% signal line Quarterly About -78%
9 Sig TQQQ + bonds 3x 9% signal line Quarterly About -72% (2010 to 2026)
FTLT TQQQ and others 3x SPY 200-day + RSI Daily Varies by variant
Holy Grail TQQQ + cash 3x TQQQ 200-day + RSI Event-driven No public record
HFEA UPRO + TMF 3x None; fixed weights Quarterly About -65% (2022)

Numbers come from different sources and periods, so compare them with care.

What they share

  • All can lose most of their value in the wrong market.
  • All depend heavily on the test period; 2010 to 2021 was unusually kind to leverage.
  • All require discipline to follow through a deep drawdown.

Choosing, if at all

  1. Decide how much you could lose without abandoning the plan. See Maximum drawdown.
  2. Keep any leveraged strategy a small part of your total money. See Position sizing.
  3. Prefer rules you understand fully over the best backtest. See Overfitting in investing.

See also

Last updated September 30, 2026. Education only, not investment advice.